GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) vs QwQ 32B

GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) vs QwQ 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
21.80
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwQ 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)QwQ 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.89.5−56.4% QwQ 32B is 56.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.62sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.00 / $3.20—
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwQ 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-non-reasoning/qwq-32b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-non-reasoning/qwq-32b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill