GPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

GPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.830.4+289.7% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 3.9× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.86s110.72s+3771.3% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 3771.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill