GPT-4.1 nano vs Ling 3.1 Flash

GPT-4.1 nano vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoLing 3.1 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.841.1+426.9% Ling 3.1 Flash is 5.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,014.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.86s13.57s+374.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 374.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itLing 3.1 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill