GPT-4.1 nano vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019

GPT-4.1 nano vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 Flash 1019Off the frontier
Intelligence
43.90
Total cost
$1552
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoLing 3.1 Flash 1019Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.843.9+462.8% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 5.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,551.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.86sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itLing 3.1 Flash 1019: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill