GPT-4.1 nano vs Muse Wonder (Max)

GPT-4.1 nano vs Muse Wonder (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.40
Total cost
$5787
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoMuse Wonder (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.852.4+571.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,786.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.85s44.47s+1460.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 1460.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itMuse Wonder (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill