GPT-4.1 nano vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 nano vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoStep 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.816.6+112.8% Step 3.5 Flash is 2.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.86s18.34s+541.3% Step 3.5 Flash is 541.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill