GPT-4.1 nano vs Step 3.7 Flash

GPT-4.1 nano vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoStep 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.819.5+150.0% Step 3.7 Flash is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.87s20.70s+621.3% Step 3.7 Flash is 621.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.40$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4.1 nano: what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-nano/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill