GPT-4o mini vs Ling 3.1 Flash

GPT-4o mini vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-4o miniNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-4o miniLing 3.1 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.741.1+513.4% Ling 3.1 Flash is 6.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,014.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.13s13.61s+122.0% Ling 3.1 Flash is 122.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.15 / $0.60$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-4o mini: what beats itLing 3.1 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4o-mini/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4o-mini/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill