GPT-5.1 Codex mini (High) vs Step 3.7 Flash

GPT-5.1 Codex mini (High) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.40
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.1 Codex mini (High)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.419.5−4.4% Step 3.7 Flash is 4.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.26s18.73s+82.6% Step 3.7 Flash is 82.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.25 / $2.00$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.1 Codex mini (High): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-mini/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-mini/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill