GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs Granite 4.2 3B

GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs Granite 4.2 3B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
28.50
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 3BOn the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
9.10
Total cost
$14.9
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh)Granite 4.2 3BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)28.59.1−68.1% Granite 4.2 3B is 68.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.91— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)151.19s35.30s−76.7% Granite 4.2 3B is 76.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.03 / $0.12
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh): what beats itGranite 4.2 3B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/granite-4-2-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/granite-4-2-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill