GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs Llama 65B

GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs Llama 65B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
28.50
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 65BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh)Llama 65BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)28.55.0−82.5% Llama 65B is 82.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)151.19sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh): what beats itLlama 65B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/llama-65b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/llama-65b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill