GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs LongCat 2.0
GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) vs LongCat 2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 19.1 | −33.0% LongCat 2.0 is 33.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $544.74 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 147.98s | 35.69s | −75.9% LongCat 2.0 is 75.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.75 / $14.0 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill