GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1

GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.1Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
$27.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.07.1−58.2% Mistral Small 3.1 is 58.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$27.82— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)8.17s11.75s+43.8% Mistral Small 3.1 is 43.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.08 / $0.14
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill