GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.1

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.420.9−31.3% MiniMax-M2.1 is 31.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)115.07s44.40s−61.4% MiniMax-M2.1 is 61.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill