GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.7

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.7. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)MiniMax-M2.7Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.422.8−25.0% MiniMax-M2.7 is 25.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)115.07s56.13s−51.2% MiniMax-M2.7 is 51.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itMiniMax-M2.7: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill