GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.442.7+40.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 40.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)131.52s23.52s−82.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 82.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill