GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.40
Total cost
$5787
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.452.4+72.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 72.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,786.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)94.34s40.70s−56.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 56.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itMuse Wonder (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill