GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.426.7−12.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 12.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)94.34s16.26s−82.8% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 82.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill