GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1060
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.426.2−13.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 13.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,060.08— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)119.45s55.17s−53.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 53.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill