GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.416.6−45.4% Step 3.5 Flash is 45.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)115.07s20.68s−82.0% Step 3.5 Flash is 82.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill