GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.7 Flash

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.419.5−35.9% Step 3.7 Flash is 35.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)94.34s18.73s−80.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 80.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill