GPT-5.3 Codex (Xhigh) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

GPT-5.3 Codex (Xhigh) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.3 Codex (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
32.50
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.3 Codex (Xhigh)Llama 3.1 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)32.56.6−79.7% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 79.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)59.96s14.40s−76.0% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 76.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.56 / $0.56
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.3 Codex (Xhigh): what beats itLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-3-codex/llama-3-1-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-3-codex/llama-3-1-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill