GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 3.4 points higher (24.1 vs 20.7) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 20.7 | −14.1% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 14.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $331.24 | −78.3% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 78.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.72s | 53.29s | −53.9% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 53.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 14.1% less intelligence, 78.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill