GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 14.8 points higher (24.1 vs 9.3) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 9.3 | −61.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 61.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $43.98 | −97.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 109.06s | 10.45s | −90.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 90.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 61.4% less intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill