GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 14.8 points higher (24.1 vs 9.3) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $46.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 9.3 | −61.4% Mistral Large 3 is 61.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $46.41 | −97.0% Mistral Large 3 is 97.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.99s | 7.23s | −93.4% Mistral Large 3 is 93.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 61.4% less intelligence, 97.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill