GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 28.3 points higher (52.4 vs 24.1) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1524; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.1, and GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 52.4 | +117.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $5,786.78 | +279.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.99s | 40.70s | −62.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 62.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 117.4% more intelligence, 279.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill