GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 8.5 points higher (24.1 vs 15.6) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 15.6 | −35.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 35.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $661.29 | −56.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 56.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 109.21s | 21.22s | −80.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 80.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 35.3% less intelligence, 56.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill