GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 14.9 points higher (24.1 vs 9.2) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 9.2 | −61.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $405.10 | −73.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.75s | 6.22s | −94.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 94.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 61.8% less intelligence, 73.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill