GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 16.3 points higher (24.1 vs 7.8) but costs 9.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 7.8 | −67.6% Solar Pro 3 is 67.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $159.22 | −89.6% Solar Pro 3 is 89.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.75s | 18.89s | −83.7% Solar Pro 3 is 83.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 67.6% less intelligence, 89.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill