GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 13.3 points higher (24.1 vs 10.8) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 10.8 | −55.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $232.95 | −84.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.72s | 8.30s | −92.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 92.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 55.2% less intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill