GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) scores 13.7 points higher (24.6 vs 10.9) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1438 vs $518; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.6 | 10.9 | −55.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,437.80 | $518.07 | −64.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 64.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 140.90s | 8.78s | −93.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 93.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh): 55.7% less intelligence, 64.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill