GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 31.1 points higher (51.8 vs 20.7) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 51.8 | +150.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $1,081.55 | +226.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 220.48s | +313.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 313.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 150.2% more intelligence, 226.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 313.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill