GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 103.4% more intelligence, 24.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 42.1 | +103.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $250.48 | −24.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 24.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.97s | 12.91s | −88.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 88.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill