GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 21.5 points higher (42.2 vs 20.7) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 42.2 | +103.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $1,630.69 | +392.3% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 80.67s | 10.72s | −86.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 86.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 103.9% more intelligence, 392.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill