GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 13.0 points higher (33.7 vs 20.7) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 33.7 | +62.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 62.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $1,737.18 | +424.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 93.46s | 21.36s | −77.1% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 77.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 62.8% more intelligence, 424.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill