GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 18.9 points higher (39.6 vs 20.7) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 39.6 | +91.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 91.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $1,385.40 | +318.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 80.67s | 21.09s | −73.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 73.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 91.3% more intelligence, 318.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill