GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 24.4 points higher (45.1 vs 20.7) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2359 vs $331; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 45.1 | +117.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $2,358.74 | +612.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 7.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.97s | 28.35s | −74.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 74.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 117.9% more intelligence, 612.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill