GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 8.0 points higher (20.7 vs 12.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 12.7 | −38.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 38.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $233.56 | −29.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 29.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.70s | 22.73s | −78.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 78.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 38.6% less intelligence, 29.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill