GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Step 3.7 Flash

GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
20.70
Total cost
$331
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.719.5−5.8% Step 3.7 Flash is 5.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$331.24Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)57.18s20.66s−63.9% Step 3.7 Flash is 63.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.25$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill