GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.20
Total cost
-
Allen Institute for AIOlmo 3.1 32B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)Olmo 3.1 32B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.26.5−64.3% Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is 64.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.86sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.50 / $15.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning): what beats itOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-non-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-non-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill