GPT-5.5 (High) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 25.4 points higher (37.0 vs 11.6) but costs 28× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $123; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 11.6 | −68.6% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 68.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $122.71 | −96.4% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 96.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.56s | 11.29s | −42.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 42.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs GPT-5.5 (High): 68.6% less intelligence, 96.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.5 (High)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill