GPT-5.5 (High) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 6.9 points higher (37.0 vs 30.1) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-5.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 30.1 | −18.6% Kimi K3 (Low) is 18.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $1,190.42 | −65.1% Kimi K3 (Low) is 65.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.56s | 53.54s | +173.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 173.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs GPT-5.5 (High): 18.6% less intelligence, 65.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 173.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.5 (High)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill