GPT-5.5 (High) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 24.3 points higher (37.0 vs 12.7) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($3181 vs $234; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 12.7 | −65.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 65.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,181.05 | $233.56 | −92.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 92.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.78s | 22.73s | −42.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 42.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (High): 65.7% less intelligence, 92.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.5 (High)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill