GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 26.4 points higher (52.4 vs 26.0) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($9244 vs $987; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 52.4 | +101.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $986.85 | $9,243.80 | +836.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 9.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.68s | 46.92s | +181.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 181.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026): 101.5% more intelligence, 836.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 181.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill