GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) scores 17.1 points higher (26.0 vs 8.9) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($987 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 8.9 | −65.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 65.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $986.85 | $63.74 | −93.5% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 93.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.37s | 10.10s | −38.3% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 38.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026): 65.8% less intelligence, 93.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.3% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill