GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) scores 15.2 points higher (26.0 vs 10.8) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1184 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 10.8 | −58.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 58.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,184.34 | $232.95 | −80.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 80.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.30s | 8.34s | −51.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 51.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026): 58.5% less intelligence, 80.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill