GPT-5.5 (Low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

GPT-5.5 (Low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.5 (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.70
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.5 (Low)Ling 3.1 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.741.1+33.9% Ling 3.1 Flash is 33.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,014.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)8.14s13.66s+67.8% Ling 3.1 Flash is 67.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $30.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.5 (Low): what beats itLing 3.1 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-low/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-low/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill