GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 12.1% more intelligence, 94.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 409.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 37.9 | +12.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 12.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,095.12 | $109.55 | −94.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 94.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.73s | 49.53s | +409.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 409.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill