GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 26.3% more intelligence, 86.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 42.7 | +26.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 26.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,095.12 | $283.18 | −86.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 86.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.63s | 23.52s | +86.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 86.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill