GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Medium) scores 18.2 points higher (33.8 vs 15.6) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1833 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 15.6 | −53.8% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 53.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,833.39 | $661.29 | −63.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 63.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.28s | 21.37s | +60.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 60.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 53.8% less intelligence, 63.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill